|
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mark
Church (Chair), Rich Gordon, Michael Guingona, John Lee, Lee Panza, Ira
Ruskin
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Joe
Galligan
STAFF PRESENT: Michael
Scanlon, Joan Cassman, David Miller, Rita Haskin, Howard Goode, Roger
Contreras, George Cameron, Joe Hurley, Martha Martinez, Jennifer Buhr
Chair Church called the meeting to
order at 10:05 a.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
Congressman Tom Lantos stated that
he is proud of the work that has been done by the TA and the people
throughout the county on behalf of transportation. Congressman Lantos
commented that he is going back to Washington D.C. next week and will
continue to put transportation at the top of his agenda.
Chair Church expressed gratitude on
behalf of the TA for the work that Congressman Lantos has done to bring
back the transportation dollars to this county.
PUBLIC
HEARING
Chairman
Church reported that the purpose of the public hearing was to discuss the
Measure A draft Expenditure Plan and provide members of the public with an
opportunity to comment on the plan. Before receiving public testimony
Chair Church asked Board Secretary Jennifer Buhr to review the steps that
have been taken to inform the public of the issues involved and to
incorporate any correspondence from the public to be incorporated into the
record.
Ms. Buhr reported that the
Transportation Authority’s official public information campaign to
announce the public hearing included advertisements for the workshop and
public hearing in the San Mateo County Times, the San Francisco Chronicle,
and the Dailies. The public hearing was also publicized through the
District’s printed agendas, the Hiller Aviation electronic message
board, a mailing of 4,000 postcards, six TA open houses, 13 city council
visits, 16 community presentations, and information placed on the TA and
TransitInfo websites. In addition, two news releases announcing the draft
Expenditure Plan have been circulated to local media. All of the comments
received at the three public workshops held in Pacifica, Daly City and
Redwood City have been incorporated into the record and are available for
review upon request.
Chair Church reported that in 1988
the County’s congestion issue was addressed by passing Measure A, which
is a 20-year half-cent sales tax dedicated to local transportation
projects. With the passage of Measure A, the San Mateo County
Transportation Authority was created to administer the funds that were
collected from this half-cent sales tax. The TA is governed by a board
of directors comprised of elected officials representing all geographic
areas of the county. Measure A expires in 2008 and unless the voters
authorize renewal the TA will no longer receive these funds to help cope
with the transportation challenges. There is an opportunity to reauthorize
Measure A with a two-thirds vote.
Howard Goode, Chief Development
Officer, focused on the process that has been followed from the technical
transportation planning and engineering side of the development of the
plan. The process included utilizing the existing Measure A
accomplishments, the Countywide Transportation Plan and the expertise that
resides in the County with the technical staff who deal with
transportation issues on a daily basis. Public input obtained from
workshops was also taken into account.
Rita Haskin, Chief Communications
Officer, reported that the public outreach and input process began 10
months ago. The information obtained from the six countywide focus groups
was used as a foundation to help get information out about the plan and
how to construct the plan. There were also three countywide workshops to
learn what people wanted in the plan. Ms. Haskin referenced a binder that
contained all the public comment that was obtained from the workshops,
which staff has reviewed. Many of the comments have been incorporated into
the plan. There were also six open houses, 13 city council visits, 16
presentations to service organizations, chambers of commerce, homeowners
associations and other stakeholders. Ms. Haskin reported that there were
news releases, which generated news articles, and there have also been
newspaper ads regarding the open houses and today’s workshop and public
hearing. Information was also available on the website and the Hiller
Aviation electronic message board.
Mr. Goode made a presentation on the
key elements of the Draft Expenditure Plan which included economic and
population growth related to congestion, maintaining control of our County’s
transportation future, TA investments, leveraging Measure A funds, putting
Measure A money to work, the Measure A outreach & reauthorization
process, project requests, allocations of new measure funds, comparison of
Measure A program funds, the emerging project list, the transit program,
the local streets & roads program, grade separations and proposed
pedestrian/bike projects.
Mr. Goode reported that in March the
TA will be asked to consider formal adoption of the Draft Expenditure Plan
and with that action, forward it to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission (MTC). MTC will evaluate the plan for consistency with the
Regional Plan. The plan then must be sent to every city council in the
county and must be approved by a majority of the cities representing a
majority of the county’s population, which is a supermajority voting
rule. The Board of Supervisors also will need to approve the plan. With
both the cities and Board of Supervisors approval, the Expenditure Plan
will be placed on the ballot, which is an action that needs to be taken in
early August in order to have it placed on the November 2004 ballot.
Before proceeding to public comment
Chair Church thanked the League of Women Voters for their work and
co-sponsoring today’s workshop. Chair Church also thanked staff for
participating in this process.
Mr. Scanlon also thanked the League
of Women Voters and also complimented the community on the receptivity to
the plan.
Public testimony was received by 22
people. Speakers included Jim Kelly, Clen Molony, Rick Gomez, Pedro
Gonzalez, Steve Morrison, Jim Bigelow, Dale Edwards, Pat Dixon, Tom
Carney, Mike Pacelli, Linda Ashbury, Margaret Okuzumi, Doris Maez, Eric
Gilbertson, Rob Gaughlan, Steve Van Pelt, Jeff Carter, Paul Shepherd,
Arthur Lloyd, Ken Feldstein, Mike Giari and Greg Greenway.
Following completion of testimony,
David Miller, Legal Counsel, reported that a formal public hearing had
been completed in accordance with the enabling legislation that governs
the Transportation Authority. Therefore, the legal requirements have been
satisfied. This matter will be back before the board on March 18, with any
further input from the public or the board, at which the Board will be
asked to adopt the measure.
The motion to close the public
hearing passed unanimously.
Chair Church commented that he has
heard many comments in regard to extending the life of Measure A and asked
staff to comment.
Mr. Scanlon responded that currently
the draft plan envisions a 20-year life. Mr. Scanlon noted that staff has
heard suggestions from the community at large that the TA consider making
the measure longer. Staff will review and report back to the board at the
March 18 meeting to discuss the potential benefits of a measure with a
longer term.
Director Lee urged the public to
communicate that this will be a reauthorization of an existing half-cent
sales tax and is not a new tax. Director Lee suggested looking at a
30-year plan because he feels so much more can be planned if there is a
dedicated income stream. Director Lee reiterated that 20 percent of the
funds would go towards the cities to fix streets. Without that 20 percent,
every city would be in desperate trouble. Director Lee opined that the
trains with Dumbarton rail should have been running a long time ago and in
regard to paratransit, Director Lee stated that it is critical to bring it
to 4 percent from the previous 3 percent.
Director Panza commented in regard
to a 30-year term by stating that although he hears that it would give
more time to acquire the funds to do the projects, it also pushes out the
time before new projects can be added for needs that aren’t yet
identified in the measure. In regard to the BART portion of the funding,
Director Panza commented that it would probably sit better with a lot of
people if there was more emphasis on enhancing the BART that already
exists and as a secondary issue, considering the study down the peninsula.
Director Panza also stated that the language needs to be clear that the TA
is not promising any of the projects. Lastly, Director Panza commented
that he has not seen any of the language in regard to the flexibility of
the measure.
Mr. Miller responded that Legal
Counsel fully agrees that the flexibility component is vital. The language
regarding Implementation Guidelines and how the board would be
administering the plan in a flexible way is nearing completion. The issue
of extending duration of the tax to 30 years may be more attractive in
light of provisions to be incorporated giving ability to the board to deal
with changing circumstances in a way that comports with the law. Mr.
Miller stated that even if there are significant changed conditions, the
statute itself will continue to govern. If there is a need for a wholesale
change, outside of the boundaries of the flexibility to be provided, there
is an amendment process available without having to reauthorize the tax.
Mr. Miller stated that these are factors that will be brought back to the
board prior to the next meeting to allow for further discussion.
Chair Church reiterated that the TA
will not be able to do everything in the measure. The total cost of the
suggested projects is more than $3.5 billion. However, the projected
income of an extended Measure A, based on a 20-year period, is only going
to be about $1.2 million billion.
DATE/TIME
OF NEXT MEETING:
The
next regular meeting will be held on March 18, 2004 at 4:30 p.m. at the
San Mateo County Transit District Administrative Building, 1250 San Carlos
Avenue, San Carlos, CA 94070
ADJOURNED: 11:48 a.m.
|