|
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael
Guingona (Chair), Joe Galligan, Rich Gordon, John Lee, Lee Panza, Ira
Ruskin
MEMBER ABSENT: Mark
Church (Vice Chair)
STAFF PRESENT: Michael
Scanlon, David Miller, Roger Contreras, Chuck Harvey, Aurora Jose, Jim
McKim, Susan Stark
Chair Guingona called the meeting to order at 5:05
p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.
PUBLIC
HEARING
Approval of
FY 2003 Capital & Operating Budgets
Susan Stark,
Director of Finance and Budgets, reported revenues for FY 2003 are
anticipated to total $71.3 million. Sales tax receipt represents 53
percent of said amount or $59.2 million. Interest income is at 16 percent
or $11.5 million. Rental is one percent or approximately $600,000. Ms.
Stark compared the proposed FY 2003 Budget with FY 2002. She discussed the
expected decline in the sales tax revenues of $11.3 million and interest
income of $2 million. She pointed to the transfers of the paratransit
trust fund into the Authority’s General Fund in the total of $4 million,
of which special allocation $1.9 was made to SamTrans to fund the
Paratransit activities in San Mateo County. She noted the bond principal
payment of $7.2 million. She also discussed various expenditure line items
that were reduced, such as the allocation to local entities, paratransit,
Dumbarton maintenance of the right of way, the TSM fund, and the San Mateo
Caltrain Shuttle Program. Ms. Stark advised that staff will bring to the
Board recommendations for the FY 2003 specific programs at a subsequent
meeting.
Jim McKim, Acting Program Manager, presented the
additional budget appropriation in the Capital Budget for FY 2003 that
includes $15.4 million for Caltrain projects. He identified the various
projects that fall under this category, among which are the TA Caltrain
projects, railroad grade separations, interchanges and auxiliary lanes,
oversight that includes strategic planning, and C/CAG Congestion Relief
Plan. Mr. McKim also discussed the cash flow for FY 2003. He stated
although the capital project approval is required in the amounts estimated
to fund the Authority’s share of the projects through completion, it is
not possible to literally complete most capital projects in a single
fiscal year. So, for planning purposes, staff prepared a cash flow
projection for the upcoming fiscal year. Mr. McKim identified the major
expenditures anticipated for next year that includes local share, Caltrain
maintenance facility, Burlingame Station, San Bruno Station platform and
track design, streets and highways. The total estimated cash flow for FY
2003 is $42.1 million.
Chuck Harvey, Chief Operating Officer, gave an
overall presentation on the Redi-Wheels paratransit and the Coastside
Opportunity services. He talked about the history of the service that
started in 1977, a decade prior to the passing of the Americans with
Disabilities Act by the Federal government, the birth of the
Transportation Authority and the explosive growth of the system and its
ridership. He stated the cost of paratransit service directly relates to
the ridership. It is the most expensive service in the transportation
field. All year long, there has been a double-digit monthly increase in
ridership, putting a strain on the system. Mr. Harvey described the
tremendous amount of efforts put in by staff and the cost associated with
meeting the ADA mandate of zero trip denial. He said the fleet started
with 19 lift-equipped buses. Today, the system has 63 minivan, 13 sedans,
and two road supervisor vehicles. Costs of these vehicles are funded by
Federal and State grants. Mr. Harvey discussed the taxi pilot program that
is now in place.
Director Lee remarked the ADA mandate of zero denial
is statistically not logical. Mr. Harvey responded the Federal government
ruled that all ADA clients are entitled to an equal opportunity in the
access to transportation. The program is very costly but the Federal
government considers it discriminatory to deny those that are difficult to
serve.
Roger Contreras, Chief Financial Officer, reported
Measure A approved by the voters in 1988, instituted a half cent sales tax
increase for 20 years to fund a variety of programs in transportation. It
also established a $25 million paratransit trust fund. The purpose is to
use the interest income to fund paratransit activities. Mr. Contreras
outlined the activities involved in the fund balances and the
augmentations made to the fund coming from increases in sales taxes
estimated to be received through the life of the fund. This year, it has
been determined that there is a decrease in the sales taxes that will be
received over the life of Measure A. The budget shows a dramatic decrease
in the funding of the paratransit trust fund. Mr. Contreras advised that
the $25 million is not available because that is the corpus of the fund.
He brought up the $3.9 million that was set aside by the Board as
inflation protection. He said this money is available. He pointed to the
projected cost of $8.1 million for the year 2003. He also itemized the
contributions of SamTrans to the program, the TDA and STA monies and the
interest income that paratransit gets from the fund under Measure A. Mr.
Contreras underscored that compared to last year’s budget, FY 2003
Budget shows a decline of $11.3 million in sales taxes for SamTrans.
Paratransit relies heavily on sales taxes. Therefore, because of this
decline, the $1.9 million Special Allocation to SamTrans is needed to fund
the ADA programs. He stated if the Board approves the special allocation,
the funds will be coming out of legally permissible funding.
At this point, the Board Secretary, Aurora Jose,
reviewed the steps taken in order to inform the public of this public
hearing. No correspondence has been received from the public.
Director Guingona called for anyone from the public
to speak. Hearing none, the Board unanimously voted to close the public
hearing.
Legal Counsel David Miller advised that the Board
has afforded the public an opportunity to comment in writing or testify on
the proposed budget. All legal requirements have been satisfied. The Board
may act on the budget as presented.
Because people from the coastside are farm workers
and have no other alternatives, Director Panza expressed concern on the
reduction of the funding under Exhibit 2. He proposed keeping the present
level of funding for the Coastside Opportunity Center. That would mean
taking the money from the General Funds referred to as the inflation fund.
Director Gordon asked if the Coastside Opportunity
Center knows about this move and if they have any plans to make
adjustments in order to continue the level of service.
Mr. Contreras responded no communication was
received from Coastside and he knows that Coastside also has reserves for
contingencies.
Director Lee remarked money is limited and everybody
is a player. The economic crisis is countywide. This is a tough program
and everybody has to share.
Director Galligan suggested if there has been no
outcry about this, that the Board act on the budget as proposed. Budget
adjustments can always be made after today.
Mr. Harvey clarified many of the services provided
on the coastside are contracted with the San Mateo County Transit
District. There are existing operating agreements on Routes 15 and 17 and
many of the paratransit services. None of those services will be impacted.
Coastside also operates some community-based type services. In view of
this, he recommended Board approval of the proposed budget, and if a
problem is identified later, staff can come back to do an adjustment for
their community-based work. At this time, staff is not aware of any
problem.
Hearing the foregoing, Director Panza withdrew his
suggestion.
Director Ruskin advised staff to let the Board know
of any logistic problems so that the Board may be able to act accordingly.
Director Panza inquired about programs that are
wrapping up that are not going to show in next year’s budget. He asked
Mr. Contreras what would happen to the $5.6 appropriations that have been
made. Mr. Contreras responded it will increase the fund balance and it
will be reflected in the schedule that will be presented in the monthly
report. Later on, that amount will be available for subsequent
appropriations by the Board.
Director Galligan asked if the money would go from
the designated fund balance to the undesignated fund balance. Mr.
Contreras answered in the positive.
The Board by roll call unanimously adopted the
budget (Resolution No. 2002-11).
CONSENT
CALENDAR
The Board
unanimously approved the following items on the Consent Calendar:
-
Minutes
of Meeting of May 2, 2002
- Adoption of Financial Statements, April 2002
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
at this time.
CITIZENS
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
Ken Colmen
reported that Jim Bigelow, after 14 years, finally decided not to remain
in the CAC. He expressed appreciation for Mr. Bigelow’s contributions to
the CAC.
CHAIRPERSON’S
REPORT
Chair
Guingona reported on the reauthorization committee meeting on May 20. In
that meeting, he advised that a TA Committee composed of Directors John
Lee, Mark Church and himself has been assigned to insure that the TA is
represented in all future meetings. The TA has included $250,000 in its
proposed budget for FY 2003 for public education program to lay the
foundation for Measure A authorization. There was a general discussion
which focused on the need for the inclusion of all interests in developing
a Measure A program and there was an agreement that wide-ranging
stakeholder recognition is essential to insure that the reauthorization
measure attracts no organized opposition. The Committee will be meeting
monthly until the Measure is authorized. This will be continuing with the
members of this Board playing a key role all the way.
Attorney David Miller advised there is a mandate in
the statute that directs this Authority prior to expiration of the sales
tax measure, to take action to give the voters an opportunity to renew or
extend it. There is a duty that exists and the corollary in expending TA
funds in order to carry on that mandate is clear.
Director Gordon mentioned a document sent by Howard
Goode, from Alameda County about reauthorization. He suggested providing
each Board member a copy of the document.
Director Panza inquired who are the members of the
reauthorization task force. Director Guingona mentioned Samceda, Board of
Supervisors, League of Women Voters, Silicon Valley Manufacturers, and
CMAQ.
SAMTRANS
LIAISON REPORT
Chair
Guingona referred to the written report that was in the packet. There were
no questions from the other Board members.
JOINT POWERS
BOARD REPORT
Executive
Director Scanlon reported as follows:
REPORT OF
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mr. Scanlon
reported Chair Guingona, Ian McAvoy and himself had a meeting with Half
Moon Bay city officials. They agreed to set up a small committee to
address some of the issues and concerns. Chair Guingona added he will
appoint a subcommittee composed of himself and Director Gordon to meet
with the Mayor of Half Moon Bay and their representatives and to have
Caltrans at the table.
CAPITAL
PROJECTS QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT – 3RD QUARTER FY 2002
Mr. Scanlon
remarked the Board members can take the report at home, study it and ask
questions later.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD:
There were no communications received.
REPORT OF LEGAL COUNSEL:
There was none at this time.
DATE AND PLACE OF NEXT MEETING: July
11, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. at 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos, California
Adjourned: 6:15 p.m.
|