|
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael
Guingona (Chair), Mark Church (Vice Chair), Joe Galligan, John Lee, Lee
Panza, Ira Ruskin
MEMBER ABSENT: Rich
Gordon
STAFF PRESENT: Michael
Scanlon, David Miller, Joan Cassman, Roger Contreras,
Rita Haskin, Howard Goode, Chuck Harvey, Aurora Jose,
Jim McKim
Chair Guingona called the meeting to order at 5:03
p.m. and led the pledge of allegiance.
CONSENT
CALENDAR
The Board
unanimously approved the following items under the Consent Calendar.
-
Minutes
of June 6, 2002 with the following correction:
- On page 3 of 5, to the sentence at the top of
the page, the word "some" should be inserted. The
sentence should read: "Because some people from the
coastside are farm workers …"
- Adoption of Financial Statements, May 2002
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
at this time.
CITIZENS
ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
Ken Colmen
stated a candidate will be proposed to replace Jim Bigelow. He reported on
the modifications being made on the CAC sub-committees’ structure, to
more clearly reflect some of the issues that the CAC is working on. The
chairs are:
- Rail sub-committee - Larry Shaine
- Non-motorized Transportation - Adrienne Leigh
- Land - Morton Frank
- Dumbarton Rail - Randy Hees
- Legislative - Tom Dickerman
- Measure A Reauthorization - Doris Maez (with
staff member Jane Lockwood)
- Highway 92 and 35 - Pat Dixon
He also advised that the Committee will take to the
Board for consideration the choosing of an alternate member. He noted a
lot of concerns on the Woodside road widening. He also commented the
strategic plan was a very good summary.
Director Church suggested that the matter of
appointing an alternate member be agendized next meeting.
CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT
-
Resolution
No. 2002-12 : Resolution of Appreciation
for Jim Bigelow
The Board,
by roll call, unanimously passed the resolution. Chair Guingona recognized
Mr. Bigelow for his dedication and advocacy of projects under the Measure
A Expenditure Plan and the development of the Dumbarton rail corridor. He
presented the resolution to Mr. Bigelow. Mr. Bigelow thanked the Board for
appointing him on the CAC and expressed pleasure and satisfaction working
on various issues.
- Chair Guingona reported on the Highway 92
improvements. A meeting is scheduled between Director Rich Gordon,
representatives of Caltrans and himself to discuss issues. He will be
reporting to the Board on the progress of the discussions.
- Chair Guingona referred to the written liaison
report in the packet pertaining to the SamTrans Board meeting of June
12, 2002.
- Regarding the SamTrans Board meeting that was held
yesterday (July 10), Executive Director Michael Scanlon made the
following reports:
JOINT POWERS
BOARD REPORT
Mr. Scanlon
gave the following reports regarding the JPB Board meeting of July 11:
Director Lee requested a report on the Giant’s
weekend games. Mr. Scanlon noted the past weekend, Caltrain carried about
25 percent of the typical load. July 4th was a holiday, falling
on a Thursday. People observed the holiday for three or four days. But for
the coming games, Caltrain is ready to transport baseball fans on BBX
buses. He also spoke about the Caltrain employees (ambassadors) at the
stations informing passengers that no train is coming.
Director Ruskin complimented Mr. Scanlon for having
ambassadors at the stations. He relayed first hand how the ambassadors
aided a friend at the station.
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
- Alameda County Reauthorization Experience
– Howard Goode, Chief Development Officer, recognized Jim Bigelow for
his exceptional involvement, support and help in the Measure A program and
his outspoken advocacy of the Dumbarton Project.
Mr. Goode presented material that was put together
by Alameda County on its Measure B reauthorization. He invited the Board’s
attention to the heading "… Public Participation Makes the
Difference." He said it was there for a reason. In their vote, they
got nearly 82 percent approval with the 2/3 requirement. Mr. Goode
described the process that was adopted two years ago. He discussed the
setting up of the Steering Committee and the Expenditure Plan
Development Committee, their composition, the projects and how funds
were allocated. They did not get the required vote on the first attempt.
He said trying for the second time in 2000, Alameda expanded outreach to
businesses and groups that opposed the 1998 plan. The plan included
something for everyone. The result was a very high approval. Mr. Goode
pointed out that doing grass roots programs paid off. Learning from
that, he stressed: (a) the need for a range of funding programs; (b) the
real decision makers need to be at the table; (c) there should be a
broad coalition; (d) reach out farther; and (e) advertise proven track
record. He cited some similarities and differences between San Mateo,
Santa Clara and Alameda counties necessitating appropriate styles of
fund raising during the campaign.
Director Lee asked if Alameda used the same
consultant as Santa Clara. Mr. Goode answered they used different
consultants.
To the question of Director Galligan on the period
covered by the Expenditure Plan, Mr. Goode answered the original was for
15 years and the second one was stretched to 20.
Regarding separations, Mr. Goode referred to the
Draft Executive Summary for the Strategic Plan Update that is in the
packet. He hopes to highlight local issues in outreach to individual
cities that will assist in formulating priorities for the Expenditure
Plan. He encouraged the Board to read through the update and provide him
with feedback. He added he had already started on this outreach by
meeting with Chair Guingona and Director Galligan and other
representatives of the cities and talked to them about the Measure. He
updated them on the status of Measure A. He also advised the Board of
the interests of city officials of San Bruno and San Mateo on the grade
separation alternatives and the presentations staff will make on this
project. All the signs indicate that they are interested in going
forward with grade separation in San Bruno.
Mr.
Scanlon reported an amount of $250,000 previously was approved by the
Board for public outreach. Staff will go out for competitive proposals
from public outreach firms. He outlined a number of modes utilized by
staff in regularly disseminating information to the public. The Grand
Jury suggests that staff do more to let the public know what the
Transportation Authority has been doing. An insert in the San Mateo
County Times that highlights the accomplishments of the Transportation
Authority soon will be published. Mr. Scanlon requested the Board to
provide staff with input regarding content for the outreach program.
- Director Lee suggested developing a structured
and coordinated program. He suggested getting Samceda as a partner.
- Director Panza suggested getting the media to
help promote the TA. It is essential that the Board go out in front
of the general public as much as possible.
- Director Ruskin stated a well-worked plan by
experts in communication and outreach is critical. He indicated that
he did not mean to exclude the grass roots.
- Director Galligan pointed out that one huge
selling point in Mr. Goode’s presentation was over the 20 years,
the TA is going to raise $800 million and do $3.2 billion worth of
work.
- Pat Dixon, CAC, suggested if staff is going to
the grass roots, they send credible representatives to the meetings.
She volunteered to field different associations in Redwood Shores
for a presentation by Mr. Goode.
- Director Church commented this will be a
combined effort with the communication experts. Community television
is another avenue that can be pursued.
REPORT OF LEGAL COUNSEL:
None at this time.
WRITTEN
COMMUNICATIONS TO AUTHORITY
Mr. Scanlon
informed that staff will respond to the letter from the Grand Jury.
Director Lee suggested attaching to the response a copy of the newspaper
insert.
DATE AND PLACE OF NEXT MEETING:
Mr. Scanlon stated staff does not see a need for a meeting in August but
submitted the matter to the pleasure of the Board. The Board unanimously
agreed to cancel the meeting of August 1. The next meeting will be on
September 5, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. at 1250 San Carlos Avenue, San Carlos,
California.
Adjourned: 6:14 p.m.
|